Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Subscribe Now: Feed Icon

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Why They Are All the "Biggest Loser"

In a previous post, I tried to justify why I watch The Biggest Loser. I'm not proud of it, but my basic argument was that shows like The Biggest Loser are really just modern game shows; they're not as fundamentally despicable as the traditional reality shows like The Bachelor and The Real World. This is one of those moments where I demonstrate to everyone why this blog is called The Loaded Diaper. Because I was full of crap. I was rationalizing a TV habit that I'm not proud of.

Well friends, admitting that you have a problem is the first step in the recovery process, right? This week, after watching the most recent episode of The Biggest Loser, I've finally admitted that this show is not a game show. It's not a contest. It's not an uplifiting story of personal struggle or of overcoming obstacles. Let's be honest. Shows like The Biggest Loser, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, Tough Love, and others that add an element of competition to the traditional reality show model have not improved the format. They haven't even changed the format. The Biggest Loser and its ilk have only made TV, and frankly our culture, less rich.

I know, I know ... this isn't funny. But who else is going to tell you that your habit of watching reality TV is strangling your ability to grow as a human? Huh? No one, that's who.

What made me change my mind? Here it is: I watched a complete episode of The Biggest Loser without fast-forwarding through the melodramatic parts, testing myself. If you watch the show, you know exactly what I'm talking about. Examples: Jillian or Bob "decide" that one of the participants is having a rough day in the gym, take this person outside, then poke and prod the contestant into an emotional breakdown - complete with synthesized heart-string progression chord muzak in the background; or how about the tear-streaked appeals when the contestants have to make their case every week that they should be able to stay at the ranch; or my personal favorite, the voice-over commentary from the participants describing every moment of a workout while trying to wring maximum drama out of problems that everyone faces on a daily basis. I usually fast-forward through this eye-rolling garbage, but I thought I'd try to endure the full-press Biggest Loser treatment this week.

Frankly, I was disgusted. I knew it was bad, but I don't think I truly appreciated how badly contrived and exploitative these shows are. I used to think The Learning Channel was TV's answer to the early 20th Century freak show, but I realize now it is actually NBC.

This week on The Biggest Loser, the show's producers brought back 2 previous winners to speak to the final 5 participants. If you ever bought into the illusion that this show actually helps people, this week your hopes were dashed. One of the returning winners has obviously worked hard and kept a lot of her weight off. The other returning winner gained almost all of his 217 pounds back, and was going through another cycle of workout/starvation to try and lose it again. It should be obvious there's a problem if you can't find two previous winners out of nine seasons that have managed to keep the weight off. Reality check: statistically, almost all of the contestants on this show will gain most, if not all, of their weight back when they leave the controlled environment of the ranch. This show isn't helping people, it's merely aggrandizing the exploitation of people who need serious long-term care.

Please, people! Can we decide as an enlightened culture that we no longer need to revel in the misery of others to find our entertainment? Haven't we evolved beyond gladiatorial displays of competition that eat away at our sense of community? All of the contestants on this show have lost, and so have we for watching. I, for one, have seen my last episode of The Biggest Loser.

Remember that anti-littering commercial with the Native American shaman who sheds a single tear when he sees a discarded plastic bottle on the roadside? After that, I felt guilty about shedding skin cells in public. We need another one of those campaigns ... maybe with Thomas Jefferson or Martin Luther King, Jr. packing up and moving to Canada after watching an episode of The Bachelorette.

P.S. -

Erica Durance, I love you.

13 comments:

  1. I'm pretty certain the biggest loser is the guy on the couch watching the show.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Their product placement commercials are the worst in the history of advertising. Not that I would expect anything from a couple of personal trainers and some reality show/contest participants, but they are ridiculous and shameful. Shameful, I say.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They're hilariously bad. Particularly the Extra gum spots. "Feel like drowning your misery in German Chocolate Cake?" Instead, try this utterly unsatisfying sour apple gum!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Which do you think more exploitative, "The Biggest Loser" or "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition?"

    Both are too painful for me to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No question that EM:HE is more exploitative. Not only is it product placement laden, but Ty Dingusberry's overacting is spectacularly bad. Particularly when he "brings the house down" (pun possibly intended) and talks in a quiet tone with his hand on the shoulder of the homeowner and the camera zooms in so close that you can see their irises expanding and contracting JUST so you can see them start crying.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you nailed it this time "Loaded Diaper." EHM & "The Biggest Loser" are both an EXTREME WASTE of my time. In fact, they could probably rename the shows that. Stick to Smallville, Discovery and The Science Channel (And I don't mean "Deadliest Catch").

    PS...Erica Durance...I love you MORE!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know why you like Biggest Loser....most contestants are from NC! I'm surprised we haven't gone to any of Ed and Hebba's events around town....Ed has a new cook book out.

    Ever wonder why at the start of the show, the contestants take off their shirts for the weigh-ins...but at the end of the show, they don't? What's up with that? They're thin at the end of the show.

    EMH is not a good show. They build cool things, but leave these poor families with big tax bills.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm pretty sure they leave their shirts on towards the end because the loose skin that is a by-product of rapid weight loss in obese people might turn the viewers off.

    I think the original "Extreme Makeover", the one about plastic surgery, was at least more honest than the current version.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I know a certain serial killer who'd love to get his hands on all that leftover skin.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It puts the lotion in the basket.

    ReplyDelete